Nanomaterials in Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Maxillofacial Defects: A Review
Dr. Swati Sangani, Dr. Jinal Patel, Dr. Vilas Patel, Dr. Sareen DusejaProblem: The maxillofacial material has some limitations. The main problem with the currently maxillofacial material is its reduced clinical longevity of the prosthesis. Because of its colour instability and material deterioration, for example, it exhibits modified texture, poorly fitting edges because of reduced tear strength. Approach: To review the impact of nanoparticle incorporation into maxillofacial material on its hardness, tear strength and colour stability. Findings: Several nanoparticles added at a concentration ranging from 1% to 3% improved the hardness, tear strength, tensile strength, percentage elongation, and colour stability. Nano?ceo2 improved the colour stability at 1% concentration and at 3% improved the hardness and tear strength. Nano?zno and Tio2 at a concentration of 2% and 2.5% improved the hardness, tear strength, tensile strength, percentage elongation, and color stability. Conclusion: With the available evidence in the literature, it can be concluded that addition of nanoparticles at various concentrations may improve the physical and mechanical properties and colour stability of the prosthesis made from the silicone elastomers.